Do Not Let The Senate Steal Your Voice In The Workplace

National_Labor_Relations_Board_logo_-_color8

NLRB 1With all the trumped up scandals in Washington right now it is hard to keep track of what is going on.  The GOP are furious about Benghazi, even after Hillary Clinton stated she requested additional security funding.  Now there is an issue with the IRS.  Yes it is wrong to target political groups for extra scrutiny but none of the groups were actually hard either.  As the politicos in Washington battle over these issues some of the other important issues are going unnoticed.

Did you know that in less than two months the entire National Labor Relation Board could be effectively closed. The NLRB is where workers go to make their case when their rights have been violated by their employer. Without a functioning NLRB, workers would have no place to go to have their grievances heard and employers will continue to trample the rights of their employees.

Currently the NLRB has only three of its five members. Two seats are vacant. When Board Chairman Mark Pearce’s term expires in August, the Board will be down to two members, which is not enough to form the quorum the Board needs to make decisions.  The US Senate is set to take up the five new appointments by President Obama sometime this summer.  The Senate Republicans are well-known for being obstructionists who oppose anything that is being proposed by President Obama.  First we must overcome this obstruction before we can even begin to discuss filling the board with new members.

As previously stated the NLRB key in protecting the rights of working people. They ensure that workers have the right to free speech without fear of termination.  Time and time again the NLRB has ruled in favor of workers who are exercising their freedom of speech online.

Aside from all the advocacy groups pushing their agendas, social media is based on people talking about what is going on in their lives.  For some this is pictures of the fancy dinner they are eating or their daughters dance recital.  For others it is a chance for people to vent to the world about something that happened to them at work.  These rants about their employers have led to the termination of some employees.  This is why we need the NLRB.  The NLRB has ruled that employees were unjustly fired for speaking out against their employer, if they were speaking out in order to improve their situation at work.

The Communication Workers of America highlight three excellent examples of how the NLRB is protecting your voice in the workplace.

  • Social Media Policies: When T-Mobile USA revamped its social networking policy, it made anonymous comments on social media websites an offense that could result in termination. It was the company’s latest attempt to silence workers who had been articulating workplace issues and discussing joining the Communications Workers of America (CWA) on worker forums, Facebook and Twitter. CWA filed an unfair labor practice charge, asserting that this was a violation of employees’ “protected concerted activity” under the NLRA. But before the case went to trial, T-Mobile USA agreed to a settlement. The company was required to inform all of its employees that they may discuss work-related issues on Facebook and similar websites without fear of reprisal.More recently, because of another CWA charge, a NLRB judge ordered DISH Network to change its social media policy that prevented workers from making “disparaging or defamatory” comments about the company. The policy infringed on employees’ rights, as workers could “reasonably construe” this rule to mean they can’t criticize their employer’s labor practices.
  • Talking about your boss: At Bettie Page, a woman’s clothing store in San Francisco, a group of employees had lodged a number of complaints with the store owners about their manager’s unprofessional behavior. Frustrated with being ignored, employees finally took to Facebook. Holli Thomas posted, “needs a new job. I’m physically and mentally sickened.” Vanessa Morris responded that the manager is “as immature a person can be” and Brittany Johnson agreed that “bettie page would roll over in her grave.” Thomas, Morris and Johnson were fired on trumped up charges. But they filed a complaint, and a NLRB judge found that they lost their jobs as a direct result of their Facebook activity. Bettie Page had clearly violated the worker’s “protected concerted activity” rights under the NLRA, and the judge ordered that it reinstate the three clerks with compensation for any loss of earnings and benefits.
  • Discussing Work Conditions: At Hispanics United of Buffalo, a nonprofit social services provider in New York, Mariana Cole-Rivera started a Facebook thread, asking, “Lydia Cruz, a coworker feels that we don’t help our clients enough at HUB. I about had it! My fellow coworkers how do you feel?” Her colleagues immediately voiced their support, writing, “Try doing my job. I have five programs” and “What the hell, we don’t have a life as is.” Cole-Rivera and four caseworkers who responded to her lost their jobs. But the NLRB found that their posts were the type of “concerted activity” for “mutual aid” that is expressly protected by the NLRA, since it involved a conversation among coworkers about their terms and conditions of employment, including their job performance and staffing levels. The judge ordered that the fired workers be fully reinstated to their jobs with back pay.

These examples highlight the need for workers to have a place to go where their issues can be heard.  The NLRB is already overloaded due to the two vacant seats and this means that workers who are awaiting a hearing are waiting months to have their termination potentially overturned.  This puts an enormous financial strain on those people forced to wait for a hearing.  If the Senate does not take action before August the entire NLRB would effectively closed down, essentially silencing workers voices.

We need to protect our freedoms and our rights at work. To do this we need and NLRB that works.  We need the Senate to take quick action to approve the Presidential appointees.
In a related note, CWA President Larry Cohen went on the Ed Show explaining the importance of the National Labor Relations Board and what must be done to ensure that all 5 members are confirmed by the Senate.

Sequester Gives Kids A Kick To The Head Start

Head Start

Head StartOnce again Congress is attacking the poor working families.  These are the families that rely on programs like Head Start to get their children started in education the right way.  Time and time again is has been proven in studies like this one from the US Dept of Health and Human Services, that head start programs help children excel in school.  These types of programs have an even bigger impact on the low-income communities, who who otherwise not be able to send their children to a pre-school class.

The gains of pre-school education have been seen by everyone all the way up to the White House.  This is why President Obama pushed for an expanded pre-school program in his State of the Union address.

“Study after study shows that the sooner a child begins learning, the better he or she does down the road.  But today, fewer than 3 in 10 four year-olds are enrolled in a high-quality preschool program.  Most middle-class parents can’t afford a few hundred bucks a week for private preschool.  And for poor kids who need help the most, this lack of access to preschool education can shadow them for the rest of their lives.

Tonight, I propose working with states to make high-quality preschool available to every child in America. Every dollar we invest in high-quality early education can save more than seven dollars later on – by boosting graduation rates, reducing teen pregnancy, even reducing violent crime.”

If Head Start is so good then why is Hudson Head Start forcing more kids out of the program. You can thank the Tea Party Republicans who forced us into the Sequester.

The Sequester is the government debt reduction plan, that slashes 5% of funding for every line item in the budget.   The Sequester was a bad idea when it was proposed, and everyone knew it.  Nobody including the President every thought Congress would let the sequester actually happen.  The sequester was ment to be something so bad that both sides would actually work together to ensure that it never went into effect.  That was the plan, and the plan was and #EpicFail.

New Hampshire may be one of the smallest users of head start, but that does not mean it is not being effected.  Due to sequester cuts NH will loose $733,000 in head start funding.  These cuts are forcing the closure of two classrooms by Southern New Hampshire Service who oversees the program in parts of Southern NH.  They will be shutting the door to 9-11 employees and forcing 18 children to find another head start school (if they can) to attend.

This may seem like a minor inconvenience for a few people and a few of the families in Hudson.  But this is Husdon, NH.  They have less that 25,000 people in the town, and this is what they are doing to their Head Start program.  Can you only imagine what that will mean for bigger school districts, and communities with much higher levels of poverty than Hudson?

Across the country these ridiculously stupid sequester cuts will slam the door of economic and educational opportunity for more than 70,000 children.  Head Start is specifically targeted to those families who could not otherwise afford to send their child to a pre-school program.  Once again, Congress is balancing the budget on the backs of working families.  They are taking away the programs that are designed to lift low-income families out of poverty.

Tell Congress you will not stand for this any longer.  Tell Congress they must end the sequester cuts now.  We have seen over the last few weeks how fast Congress can act when they actually want to pass legislation.  They need to act like that now! They need to work together to save programs like Head Start and the hundreds of other programs being slashed by the sequester cuts.

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka’s Statement on FY 2014 Budget Proposal

Richard_Trumka

From WIKIPediaA president’s budget is more than just numbers.  It is a profoundly moral document.  We believe cutting Social Security benefits and shifting costs to Medicare beneficiaries – while exempting corporate America from shared sacrifice – is wrong and indefensible.

The administration’s budget cuts cost-of-living increases for current and future Social Security beneficiaries by $130 billion over 10 years, and much more in future years.  It shifts $64 billion in health care costs to Medicare beneficiaries over 10 years.  Yet despite closing some loopholes, it calls for corporate income tax reform that is “revenue neutral” – meaning it fails to ask big, profitable corporations to pay their fair share of taxes.

The Obama budget also continues to demand more sacrifice from federal employees than from Wall Street.  Federal employees did not cause the Great Recession.  They did not cause the deficits that resulted from the Great Recession.  Yet their pay and their retirement keeps getting cut.  Why?

Putting aside the injustice of demanding sacrifice from the innocent while letting the guilty off scot free, the Obama budget falls short of putting our economy on a path towards higher wages and full employment.  As we have said many times, the greatest economic challenge facing America is the jobs crisis, not the deficit.  Yet the administration cuts the part of the budget that pays for investments in worker training and jobs, which has already been cut to its lowest level since the Eisenhower administration, by another $100 billion. This austerity budget is bad economic policy at a moment when the economy remains weak and we urgently need more job-creating investments.

The President’s budget does include several proposals worthy of praise.  It aims to provide universal access to pre-kindergarten programs that are so important to our children.  It strengthens programs to protect workers against wage theft, unsafe workplaces and employer retaliation. It closes the outrageous loophole that allows Wall Street financial managers to pay a special lower tax rate.  And it reforms some of the tax loopholes that allow corporations to get away with shifting profits overseas to avoid U.S. taxes.

Last November, working Americans voted for jobs and growth, not for budget austerity and benefit cuts.  We urge the President to drop these cuts and build support for investing in jobs.

 

CWA Praises President Obama For Nomination To NLRB and Call For Quick Senate Confirmation

CWA Logo

Washington, D.C. — The Communications Workers of America commends President Obama for putting forward three additional nominations to the National Labor Relations Board. These nominations, together with two previously announced, would restore the NLRB to full status and will ensure that a functioning NLRB can enforce workers’ rights on the job.

The NLRB protects workers in the American workplace.  It’s where workers turn when they are fired and their free speech is threatened.

“It’s important that the Senate moves quickly, to counter a cynical move by House Republicans to stop the NLRB from making any decisions without a quorum of three, despite the fact that Senate Republicans have blocked all nominations to the Board. The ridiculously named ‘Preventing Greater Uncertainty in Labor-Management Relations Act’ will come up for a House vote later this week,” said CWA President Larry Cohen.

“The US Chamber of Commerce and many of its corporate members would prefer that the NLRB not function at all. As a result of Republican obstructionism in the Senate, 85 million workers have lost a critical path to workplace justice as a growing number of corporations are refusing to abide by Board decisions,” he said.

Now it’s up to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate leaders to move the President’s nominations to the Senate floor and work to have them confirmed.

If the nominations are blocked by the Republican minority, Majority Leader Reid must be ready to confront that obstructionism to keep this agency functioning.

Senator Sanders and AFLCIO To Deliver 2 Million Petitions To Reject Social Security Cuts

Flicker Creative Commons via DonkeyHotey

Organizations Representing Tens of Millions of Americans to Deliver Over 2 Million Petition Signatures Directly to the White House Rejecting Cuts to Social Security Benefits

Will Be Joined By U.S. Senator Who Vows to Block Benefit Cuts

Coalition Includes AFL-CIO, MoveOn.org, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, CREDO, National Organization for Women, Social Security Works, Alliance for Retired Americans, National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, Democracy For America, Campaign for America’s Future, The Other 98%, Progressives United, Blue America, Rebuild the Dream, Center for Community Change, Health Care for America Now and Others

(Washington, DC)  Senator Bernie Sanders and Reps. Mark Takano and Rick Nolan will join organizations representing tens of millions of Americans to deliver more than two million petition signatures opposing cuts to Social Security benefits to the White House on Tuesday, April 9, 2013 at 12:30 p.m. ET.

*Watch Livestream herestrengthensocialsecurity.org/sos

Leading progressive organizations, groups representing retired Americans were quick to denounce the White House proposal for “chained CPI” — which would cut Social Security benefits for millions of seniors and veterans. Grandparents who retire today would get $650 less a year when they are 75 and over $1,100 less a year when they reach age 85, according to the Social Security Administration.

U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who will join the event, vowed last week to “do everything in my power to block President Obama’s proposal to cut benefits for Social Security recipients through a chained consumer price index.”

WHO:             -Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

-Rep. Mark Takano (D-CA)

-Rep. Rick Nolan (D-MN)

-Former Obama for America Supporters & Seniors on Social Security

-Stephanie Taylor, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Co-Founder

-Jim Dean, Democracy for America, Chair

-Damon Silvers, AFL-CIO, Policy Director

-Max Richtman, Nat. Cmmte. to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, President and CEO

- Bonnie Grabenhofer, National Organization for Women, Executive Vice President

-Roger Hickey, Campaign for America’s Future, Co-director

-Manny Herrmann, MoveOn.org Deputy Dir. of Online Organizing Platforms

WHAT:          Delivery of more than 2 million petition signatures directly to the White House

WHEN:          Tuesday April 9, at 12:30pm (ET)

WHERE:           1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW – Washington DC (In front of the White House opposite of Lafayette Square)

*Watch Livestream herestrengthensocialsecurity.org/sos

The House GOP Is Acting Like Teenagers, As President Obama Submits His Budget

teenagers

This Wednesday, President Obama is expected to file his budget proposal for the next fiscal year.

Are you wondering why his budget is expected to include

Straight from an observer in DC, here is the best explanation I’ve heard so far:  Having President Obama support these policies is a guaranteed way to get Republicans to oppose them.

“Yes, we have reached that level of adolescence on Capitol Hill.”

By U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 2nd Class Nathanael T. Miller [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Here’s the thing about teenagers: they don’t always think ahead to the consequences of their actions.

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka Comments on March Jobs Report And President Obama’s Budget Plans

Richard_Trumka

From WIKIPediaToday’s announcement that the economy added only 88,000 jobs in March underscores the reality that the real challenge our nation faces is a jobs crisis..  We are still creating fewer jobs than we need to get us back to post-recession employment rates.  We are going from month to month with our fingers crossed in hope of decent growth, while we should be investing in our infrastructure and rebuilding the middle class.

In Washington, we are still engaging in an upside-down debate.  News that the President is planning to unveil a budget that cuts Social Security and Medicare benefits for working families is a sign of the wrong-headed policy driving our slow recovery.  Millions of Americans remain out of work and the job market is especially devastating for young people.  Young people ages 20-24 are facing 13.3% unemployment rates. Without the prospect of good jobs in their early and crucial earning years, these young people will bear the cost of these proposed cuts in Social Security.

This past November, voters rejected the failed policies of Romney/Ryan and voted for President Obama in hopes that a second term would mean that working families would share in our nation’s prosperity.  This budget dampens those hopes.  But, even worse, it’s bad for the economy.

We continued to reject chained CPI and means testing for Medicare as more “Washington speak” that disguises awful ideas that harm working families  The President should drop these misguided cuts in benefits and focus instead on building support in Congress for investing in jobs.

Statement by AFT President Randi Weingarten on Nomination of Thomas Perez as Labor Secretary

AFT Logo
Washington—American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten released the following statement on President Barack Obama’s nomination of Thomas Perez to head the U.S. Department of Labor.

“At a time when workers’ rights of all kinds—from the right to fair and equal treatment in the workplace to the right to safe working conditions and beyond—must be defended more resolutely than ever, I congratulate Thomas Perez on his nomination to serve as the next Secretary of Labor. I urge the Senate to confirm his appointment swiftly.

“Mr. Perez has an extensive background as a champion for fairness and dignity on the job, and as a person who takes on discrimination and exploitation wherever he encounters it. As the son of immigrant parents, he has spent his entire career demonstrating his commitment to equality for all who call America home. I look forward to Mr. Perez having the opportunity to bring his dedication to making the American dream attainable for all hardworking families to the U.S. Department of Labor.”

The United Steelworkers Support Perez for Department of Labor

Steelworkers logo USW

(PITTSBURGH) – The United Steelworkers (USW) released this statement today from International President Leo W. Gerard in support of President Obama’s nomination of Thomas Perez as the administration’s new Secretary of Labor:

“All workers should be thrilled with President Obama’s nomination of Thomas Perez as Secretary of Labor. Mr. Perez has a long and distinguished record of standing up and fighting for the rights of his fellow Americans. He has worked hard to protect some of our nation’s most vulnerable workers from discrimination and exploitation.

“Whether the issue was civil rights, immigration, education, health and safety, wages, health care or veterans’ affairs, Mr. Perez has been on the side of working people every step of the way throughout his career.

“Most of all, Thomas Perez understands the challenges that working families face in this country and he has proven that he will be an aggressive champion for them. He’s exactly the kind of advocate Americans deserve as their Labor Secretary, and we look forward to his swift confirmation.”

The USW represents about 850,000 workers in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean in a wide variety of industries, ranging from glassmaking to mining, steel, oil, paper, tire and rubber to the public sector, service and health care industries.

Kuster Urges President Obama to Establish Manufacturing Innovation Institute in New Hampshire

President Obama at factory (WH Photo Pete Souza)

President Obama at factory (WH Photo Pete Souza)

President Obama at factory (WH Photo Pete Souza)

Says skilled workforce, strong manufacturing focus make Granite State optimal location for new institute

WASHINGTON, D.C. – To help nurture innovation and spur advances in high-tech manufacturing in the Granite State, Congresswoman Annie Kuster (NH-02) today urged President Obama to establish a Manufacturing Innovation Institute in New Hampshire. In his State of the Union Address in February, the President called on Congress to create a network of 15 high-tech manufacturing institutes that will help drive innovation, create jobs, and ensure that the next generation of innovative breakthroughs happens in states like New Hampshire.

In a letter to President Obama, Kuster described New Hampshire as an optimal location for an innovation institute.

“As your Administration continues its efforts to train American workers, make our country more competitive, and help create jobs, I request that you include New Hampshire in the recently proposed National Network for Manufacturing Innovation,” Kuster wrote. “With our skilled workforce, first class universities and community colleges, successful public-private partnerships, and high-tech businesses, the Granite State is already at the forefront of the American manufacturing renaissance and is uniquely qualified to host a regional hub of manufacturing excellence.”

Kuster also highlighted successful partnerships between private industry and educational institutions in the Granite State that are already helping match workers with the skills they need to get well-paying jobs.

“To close the ‘skills gap’ that is preventing workers from filling technical jobs, Granite State businesses are working with the Regional Center for Advanced Manufacturing at Keene State College, the Advanced Machine Tool Center at Nashua Community College, and innovative initiatives across our state,” Kuster wrote. “With these resources and others, New Hampshire is well positioned to capitalize on federal investments in advanced manufacturing infrastructure.”

The proposed Manufacturing Innovation Institutes would help convene businesses, universities and community colleges, and government to drive manufacturing innovation, spur economic growth, and create jobs across the country. Last year, the Obama Administration launched a manufacturing institute in Youngstown, Ohio as part of a $45 million pilot program led by the Department of Defense.

 

The full text of the letter is below:

The Honorable Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20500

 

Dear President Obama: 

As your Administration continues its efforts to train American workers, make our country more competitive, and help create jobs, I request that you include New Hampshire in the recently proposed National Network for Manufacturing Innovation.  With our skilled workforce, first class universities and community colleges, successful public-private partnerships, and high-tech businesses, the Granite State is already at the forefront of the American manufacturing renaissance and is uniquely qualified to host a regional hub of manufacturing excellence.

I share your view that, while the private sector is the engine of job creation in our economy, it is the responsibility of government to foster the conditions businesses need to expand, hire, and succeed in today’s increasingly global economy.  That is why I launched my ongoing “Congress at Your Company” series to listen to businesses leaders and workers across New Hampshire and discuss ways the federal government can better support economic growth.

On factory floors big and small, I have heard firsthand the challenges American manufacturers face in recruiting the skilled workers needed to compete in in the 21st century economy.  To close the “skills gap” that is preventing workers from filling technical jobs, Granite State businesses are working with the Regional Center for Advanced Manufacturing at Keene State College, the Advanced Machine Tool Center at Nashua Community College, and innovative initiatives across our state.  With these resources and others, New Hampshire is well positioned to capitalize on federal investments in advanced manufacturing infrastructure.

From harnessing woody biomass for renewable power, to supplying our military with state-of-the-art electronics, to developing the cutting edge in medical research, New Hampshire employers and educators are at the forefront of the innovative work that will maintain our country’s status as a magnet for investment and job creation.  To maximize the impact of these ongoing efforts, I request that your Administration invest in a New Hampshire Manufacturing Innovation Institute and help ensure that the world’s great innovations continue to be developed here in the United States.  Thank you for your consideration of this request.