Verizon as a case study of what’s wrong with our economy, part 4
Remember when George Bush selected Enron executive Thomas White to be Secretary of the Army? Remember how, when he left Enron, White received a $13 million payment for “phantom stock”?
That was early in the biggest corporate meltdown in history (at the time). And when analysts tried to reconstruct what went wrong, Enron’s “phantom stock” program was part of the explanation. “According to documents provided by Enron to the IRS, in 2000, approximately 1,673 employees participated in the program.” “Enron’s SEC filings reveal that some payouts under the phantom stock plan were huge.”
Wondering what “phantom stock” is?
Well… it actually isn’t. Because it’s imaginary. It doesn’t exist. In the terminology of Verizon’s “Executive Deferral Plan”… it’s just “hypothetical.”
Ah yes… as I was researching this series, I stumbled over traces of Verizon’s phantom stock.
For instance, according to SEC filings, Verizon Director Richard L. Carrion “owns” more than 98,500 shares of Verizon’s phantom stock. “Each share of phantom stock is the economic equivalent of one share of common stock and is settled in cash. The shares of phantom stock become payable following the reporting person’s termination of service as a director.” As of last week, Carrion’s phantom shares were “worth” more than $4.3 million. Which, under a 2004 tax law, apparently isn’t subject to taxation until the money is actually paid to Carrion. After “termination of [his] service as a director.”
And apparently, until the money’s paid out, Verizon’s phantom shares remain so hypothetical that not only are they not taxed…
Hopefully, I just missed it. Hopefully, the shareholders have some way of knowing exactly how much “economic equivalent” is out there as a standing liability for future payment. Because when I added up all of the directors’ phantom stock I could find in the SEC filings, it totaled more than 400,000 shares — which would be worth more than $18 million at last week’s stock prices.
And Verizon doles out lots of phantom stock – not just to directors, but also to Verizon employees.
For instance, Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam. According to SEC filings, McAdam “owns” more than 278,900 phantom shares of Verizon stock. What’s that worth? I have no idea. According to the filings, the phantom stock McAdam “owns” is the economic equivalent of only “a portion” of the corresponding shares of Verizon stock. How big a “portion”? I have no idea. I couldn’t find that anywhere, either.
Based on what I could find, 10 Verizon employees who report their ownership to the SEC together “own” more than 1.5 million phantom shares. All reported as “deferred compensation” – payable in the future – but I couldn’t find any record of how much Verizon’s total long-term liability is, for all these “hypothetical” shares.
I couldn’t even find out how many people “own” phantom stock through Verizon’s “Executive Deferral Plan.” Although “a company’s officers and directors” are required to file ownership disclosures with the SEC, other top- and mid-level executives aren’t required to do so. (And remember, Enron reportedly had about 1,673 executives in its phantom stock program.)
And it gets worse.
That Executive Deferral Plan (EDP) also offers “a ‘Moody’s’ investment fund that provides a return that mirrors the yield on certain long-term, high-grade corporate bonds.” (page 8) But again, this isn’t an actual investment in an actual investment fund. No, remember, this Plan “is not funded and has no trust or assets to secure your benefits.” (page 17) Because, Verizon tells its executives, “If the EDP were funded by a trust, you would be subject to immediate income tax on your vested Plan benefits.” (also page 17)
Instead, this Plan seems to be just a bookkeeping mechanism. The Plan summary explicitly says: “the investments referred to in the Plan are hypothetical in nature… the Plan administrator will track the performance of the investments that correspond to the hypothetical investments in your EDP account, and the value [of] your EDP account will be adjusted to reflect the gains (and losses) of the investments corresponding to the hypothetical investments in your account.” (also page 17)
But I couldn’t find out how much money – total – is hypothetically “invested” in this hypothetical “Moody’s” fund. I couldn’t find out how many executives participate. So what’s the long-term liability to Verizon’s bottom line?
And it gets worse. There are apparently still other hypothetical investment options. From the Plan Summary: “[Y]ou can elect to have your EDP account treated as if it were invested in any of the hypothetical investment options that mirror the performance of the investment options that are available under the Verizon Savings Plan for Management Employees or the Verizon Business Savings Plan for Management Employees, whichever applies to you.”
But the bottom line liability? How much is owed to Verizon executives under this Plan? I couldn’t find it. Anywhere. (If you can find it, please leave me a note in the comments!)
Remember that one Enron executive, Thomas White, received $13 million for his phantom stock… and there were 1,670 other enrollees in that company’s program.
Now… I’m not trying to draw an analogy between Enron and Verizon. But the “phantom stock” thing really caught my attention.
And it makes me uncomfortable that Verizon – which has about 178,000 working families depending on it for paychecks – is run by executives who are willing to put millions of dollars of their own money into “hypothetical” investments…
…just to delay taxation on I can’t tell how much executive compensation…
…at the same time Verizon is insisting on concessions from its employee unions.
And it’s not just Verizon. It’s corporations throughout our economy.
Big bucks to executives (who are using all kinds of imaginative ways to avoid taxation)… while working families are expected to give money back, to improve the corporate bottom line.
It’s why our economy isn’t working, for anybody but the folks at the very, very top.
If you want to support the 39,000 Verizon employees who have been working without a union contract since August 1st, you can sign the petition here.
Stand Up to Verizon is on Facebook here.
Part one of this “Verizon as a case study” series is here. It focuses on Verizon’s $5 billion stock buyback last February, and the short-term bump in stock prices which followed.
Part two of the series, showing how Verizon executives benefited from the $5 billion buyback, is here.
Part three of the series, looking at the disconnect between Verizon’s reported profits and the dividends it pays its stockholders, is here.
This part four.
Part five, about how Verizon is borrowing money to pay stockholders and executives while demanding givebacks from unions, is here.
Part six calculates that — because of all the dividends and long-term borrowing — each share of Verizon stock now represents less than $3 in stockholder equity (even while it’s trading at more than $40 a share); read it here.
And yes, there will be more in the series. Please check back.
Read more about how US tax policy encourages profit-taking — even profit-taking that bankrupts corporations — in “What Mitt Romney Taught Us about America’s Economy” here.