Looks like Boeing’s corporate culture is still stuck in that same old pattern. Still looking for government handouts, still insisting on concessions from their labor unions. Or they’ll (once again) move production to a low-labor-cost southern state that is willing to give them lots of money to locate there. (How much is “lots”? According to Reuters, the package on the table in Washington state is: $8 billion in tax incentives plus another $10 billion in transportation infrastructure.)
Now… myself, I remember (vividly!) a certain NLRB case, the last time Boeing threatened its unions and moved production to a southern state. Do you think that maybe Boeing didn’t get the memo when the Senate finally confirmed President Obama’s NLRB appointments?
Or is Boeing just trying to create another opportunity to litigate all those anti-worker legal theories, which weren’t tested because the Machinists asked the NLRB to drop that enforcement action?
I, myself, don’t see any significant difference between Reuters’ account of what is happening now and what happened back when Boeing moved Dreamliner production out of Washington. But maybe that’s just me.
And maybe I’m the only one who thinks that low labor costs don’t lead to high-quality products.
And maybe I’m the only one who thinks that holding local jobs hostage while basically forcing a government to give you money isn’t an honorable way to do business.
But then again, I’m not a Boeing stockholder.
And I’m not likely to fly anywhere on a Dreamliner, any time soon.
Read NHLN’s previous Boeing coverage here.